1Quantitative Biosciences, Inc.
2University of California, San Diego, Department of Bioengineering
3University of California, San Diego, Division of Biological Sciences
4University of California, San Diego, BioCircuits Institute
Microbial strain libraries have been useful for the advancement of biological research. These libraries include those which study the effects of gene knockouts1, fluorescently labeled genes2, or novel synthetic constructs3. Laboratory automation has accelerated the rate at which these libraries may be generated, however, screening tools are often limited to batch systems.
Towards this end, multiplexed microfluidic platforms serve as a means to survey libraries of strains in parallel under continuous growth conditions. Existing multiplexed devices4, 5 rely on growth in liquid media before loading onto devices. With the ROTOR from Singer Instruments, it is now possible to simultaneously load an SBS-formatted microfluidic device directly from an agar plate. This enables the real-time dynamic interrogation of microbial strain libraries, a useful tool for the study of biological networks and screening of gene circuits in synthetic biology.
Figure 1: Microfluidic loading with the ROTOR from Singer Instruments. Strain libraries of E. coli or S. cerevisiae are grown on 96 SBS-density PlusPlates, and re-arrayed at an eventual 6,144 SBS-density before colony deposition onto microfluidic components.
A multiplexed microfluidic array is created by spacing 2,176 strain banks at a 6,144 SBS-density, or 1.125 mm apart. Strain banks are separated into two 17×64 sections and fed media through a manifold-based fluidic assembly. Cells are spotted into a 500 um diameter circular spotting region, from which they are wetted and grow towards the media channel interface. At this interface, exponentially growing cells are imaged with outgrowing cells washed away towards the outlet channels.
In preparation for loading onto microfluidic devices, strain libraries are grown on agar-based media in PlusPlates from Singer Instruments. Libraries, initially stored and grown at a 96 or 384 SBS-density, are arrayed onto four fresh agar plates at a 1,536 SBS-density using a Stinger attachment for the ROTOR or a PIXL from Singer Instruments. The four plates are finally combined into a 6,144 density arrangement mirroring that of the microfluidic array before direct transfer onto the Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) component of the microfluidic
assembly (Fig. 1).
To accurately transfer microbial colonies from agar plates to PDMS, cells are initially spotted as alignment markers onto an acrylic microfluidic-to-ROTOR adapter. The PDMS device is then aligned to these alignment markers, feature-side-up, where surface adhesion prevents slipping and misalignment of the PDMS. The PDMS-acrylic assembly and glass slide are exposed to oxygen plasma, after which colonies are transferred from the 6,144 density agar plate to the PDMS device using a standard ROTOR from Singer Instruments 6,144 short RePad. PDMS is bonded at 37C for 1-2 hours before wetting with the respective growth medium (Fig. 2).
Figure 2: A 2,176-strain microfluidic device (A) Something. (B) A subsection of 4 of the 2,176 strain banks on a microfluidic device. Cell spotting and growth regions are highlighted in green. Inflow and outflow channels are marked with directional arrows.
“The ROTOR enables the real-time dynamic interrogation of microbial strain libraries”.
The loading of these highly-multiplexed microfluidic devices with the ROTOR from Singer Instruments was validated using previously engineered fluorescent libraries of both E. coli and S. Cerevisiae3, 2. Libraries were assessed for vaiability after spotting, cell retention, and measurable fluorescent signal. After verification of successful growth and imaging of these strains, the libraries were subjected to temporal environmental perturbations, including carbon-source shifts, hyperosmotic stress, and exposure to numerous inducing compounds (Fig. 3).
Figure 3: An E. coli strain library on a 2,176-strain microfluidic device. (A) A single transmitted light image capturing the full device. (B) A microfluidic strain bank after initial spotting and chip wetting (left) and after 16 hours of growth (right). (C) 50 fluorescence traces obtained from an E. coli promoter library, for which a different promoter drives the expression of GFP in each strain, during a glucose-lactose-gluce carbon source shift. Two lacZ promoter strains are highlighted in red, while the traces from 48 other promoters are shown in gray.
1. Tomoya Baba, Takeshi Ara, Miki Hasegawa, Yuki Takai, Yoshiko Okumura, Miki Baba, Kirill a Datsenko, Masaru Tomita, Barry L Wanner, and Hirotada Mori. Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Molecular systems biology, 2:2006.0008, jan 2006.
2. Won-ki Huh, James V Falvo, Luke C Gerke, Adam S Carroll, Russell W Howson, Jonathan S Weissman, and Erin K O Shea. Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature, 425:686–691, 2003.
3. Alon Zaslaver, Anat Bren, Michal Ronen, Shalev Itzkovitz, Ilya Kikoin, Seagull Shavit, Wolfram Lieber-meister, Michael G. Surette, and Uri Alon. A comprehensive library of fluorescent transcriptional reporters for Escherichia coli. Nature Methods, (8):623–628, 2006.
4. Ce Zhang, Hsiung-Lin Tu, Gengjie Jia, Tanzila Mukhtar, Verdon Taylor, Andrey Rzhetsky, and Sava ̧s Tay. Ultra-multiplexed analysis of single-cell dynamics reveals logic rules in differentiation. Science Advances, 5(4):eaav7959, apr 2019.
5 .Francesca Volpetti, Ekaterina Petrova, and Sebastian J Maerkl. A Microfluidic Biodisplay. ACS Synthetic Biology, 6:1979–1987, 2017.
“ Accurately transfer microbial colonies from agar plates to PDMS with the ROTOR from Singer”.